Comfy, not stretchy
I got the XS which was too small for me, realistically. I still wore it once but I might give the Small a go next time! It did have some space at the top despite the rest being quite tight on me so hopefully that is not problematic at larger sizes. It's worth the rental and I may be giving it another go!
Member Fit Notes
Size Worn: XSR
Usual Size: 2
LyndaTop Contributor
Size 2
5' 4"
125 lbs
Athletic
34B
34 yrs
Scrub fab
Based on previous reviews, I sized up to a Med. Loose everywhere except thighs. Looked great bc of details but fit & feel weren't the best. Felt like wearing stiff scrubs. Would try a Small next time. However, my 15 yo son wore them. He looooved the look and fit. Could have sized up to a Large.
Size Worn: MR
Usual Size: 6
ChristianTop Contributor
Size 6
5' 4"
127 lbs
Athletic
34C
41 yrs
Fit nice but didn’t like the lines on pant
Member Fit Notes
Size Worn: MR
Usual Size: 6
LeoraTop Contributor
Size 6
5' 7"
148 lbs
Straight & narrow
36B
48 yrs
Good for a hike
These pants, as you'll read from other reviews, are kind of a weird material and fit with the elastic waist - they remind me of cargo pants little boys wear in elementary school. That being said, these pants were perfect for a hike, which is rare for RTR items. Thick material and roomy, and they definitely look cooler wearing them than on the hanger. They're a little stiff for just chilling or hanging out.
Member Fit Notes
Size Worn: MR
Usual Size: 6
OliviaTop Contributor
Size 6
5' 4"
150 lbs
Athletic
34B
30 yrs
Tight Thighs!
Cute pants, more structured than expected. Very slender cut through the thigh, so they were too uncomfortable for me! If you would describe your legs as “athletic” you may want to size up or skip.
Member Fit Notes
Size Worn: XSR
Usual Size: 4
Becky Top Contributor
Size 4
5' 4"
130 lbs
Hourglass
32B
40 yrs
Laughably short for a 5'8" lady
Thought these would be quarantine chic - elastic waist, comfy cotton, Moto pant style. Just way too short. I would say best for a 30" inseam.
Size Worn: NONE
Usual Size: 8
AlisonTop Contributor
Size 8
5' 9"
150 lbs
Straight & narrow
34C
37 yrs
Weird fit
Not recommended if you have any muscle on your legs. Kind of an odd fit around the waist, hips, and crotch also. A confusing pair of pants.
Member Fit Notes
Size Worn: SR
Usual Size: 4
CarolTop Contributor
Size 4
5' 5"
130 lbs
Hourglass
34D
31 yrs
Too small
Too small even though used the reviews
Member Fit Notes
Size Worn: SR
Usual Size: 6
GriffinTop Contributor
Size 6
5' 9"
150 lbs
Athletic
34DD
29 yrs
Too tight in hips and inseam
Size Worn: NONE
Usual Size: 10
ElizabethTop Contributor
Size 10
5' 5"
175 lbs
Hourglass
36DD
34 yrs
Comfy, soft pant with pockets!
Would rent again sized down, Large was swimming on me.
Member Fit Notes
Size Worn: LR
Usual Size: 10
AnneTop Contributor
Size 10
5' 7"
155 lbs
Pear
34C
54 yrs
Did Alfred Dunner make these pants?
I would describe these pants as a combination between Alfred Dunner pants that are mostly worn by older folks and hospital scrubs. The difference is though that normally both of the aforementioned are comfortable these pants are not. I do not have a big butt or thighs but I struggled to pull these up over my thighs and butt. The waist band was also tight and when I sat down the pants came up and pulled in the thighs, I wore them for an hour. The only cute things are the colors and the pockets. I would skip these.
Member Fit Notes
Size Worn: XLR
Usual Size: 12
LisaTop Contributor
Size 12
5' 1"
145 lbs
Petite
42 yrs
Really weird fit. Not going to wear these pants.
Tight through the waist and quads and waaay loose in the in between which created odd folds in the fabric and just were not at all flattering.
Member Fit Notes
Size Worn: SR
Usual Size: 4
MichelleTop Contributor
Size 4
5' 5"
128 lbs
Athletic
34B
44 yrs
